
Monday, March 31, 2008
CONTEMPORARY EXHIBITS 2006-07

Wednesday, March 26, 2008
POST MODERN ART Continued

Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Correction
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
THE POSTMODERN ERA BEGINS

Postmodern Art is seen as starting in the 60's as part of the cultural revolution that was taking place. The new thinking was based on the Philosophies of Derrida and Foucault ,and was known as Deconstructionism. It was being taught in University Philosophy and Literature Depts. Derrida believed that all the world was a text and that language had hidden meanings that could be uncovered if we looked at opposites of words used and for words not used . Foucault focused on the categories we build with our language that include/exclude and how these limit our thinking. He looked at the power sources that determined what was allowed in our categories.
These are oversimplifies and condensed descriptions but these theories stimulated people to think in terms of inclusion/exclusion in our society and they rebelled against single theories of Marx, Freud, Einstein, Clement Greenberg, who built "grand narratives" that locked in our thinking . There was a clamoring for inclusion of minority groups: racial, ethnic, gender, into the mainstream of American culture- a decenturing in our culture.
In addition there was a new focus in Psychology that developed from Existential Philosophy and became known as Humanistic Psychology. The emphasis was on finding the authentic person under the overlays of society's rules and regulations, categories and language. This gave impetus to the "do your own thing" culture, and where better to express yourself than in the arts? In addition, the Vietnam war, seen as immoral and unnecessary fanned the flames of protests and demands for inclusion of all groups in decision making in contemporary society.
In art the revolt was against exclusive styles of art with their own rules and regulations, and artists, beginning with the Pop Artists of the 50's, brought art to the people in the form of message art presented with their own bodies in performance, or installed outdoors or indoors, or painted compilations of symbols of every day life. Much of this was criticized as "Kitsch" such as Kienholz's decaying cars and houses, Jenny Holzer's electronic billboards flashing messages, Baldessari's use of ordinary objects, and Elizabeth Murray's inclusion of kitchen items . Some were taken more seriously because of their breakthroughs with new material, their witty uses of their own bodies as well as found objects, and the social messages their art expressed. Eva Hesse and Bruce Nauman are prime examples, as was Gilbert and George who made huge photographic pieces satirizing institutions, and glorifying the commonality of man that included photos of their own "living sculpture".
We ended the session with Nam June Paik, the video artist, who worked with electronic musicians and technicians to create imaginative art that commented on our culture on videos and with videos and spawned a whole generation of artists who experimented with video and electronic art.
These artists went further than the Modern artists in individual expression without stylistic rules --sometimes too far, in that they lost contact with the art audience. The sixties started a chaotic era that is still with us. It broke boundaries of all kinds and allowed for the use of multi-media and seemingly never ending inventions. Blake said, "How do we know what's far enough, until we have gone too far". We probably will never go back to the era of art gurus and will create new venues for showing non-museum style art, but we don't know yet if we have gone "too far" in the past 40+years. In the meantime, artists have continued to explore and break boundaries and we'll follow those decades in the next two weeks.
Monday, March 10, 2008
MODERN ART IN THE 40'S AND 50'S

In our last session I talked about the continuum in experience from largely intellectual aspects to largely aesthetic aspects. All experiences have both, somewhere along the continuum. It's good to recognize both in all of our experiences, and question our own balance.
We then looked at parallel developments in Music and Literature, citing Schoenberg, Webern, Stravinsky as musicians who changed the established concept of musical keys. The riot in the concert hall when Stravinsky's Rite of Spring was played for the first time took place in 1913, the very same year in which the viewers of the Armory show in which Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase was shown, rioted. Parallel changes were also taking place in literature with James Joyce changing the established rules of language use and compressing time into one day. Dostoevsky also compressed time and Ambrose Bierce described only one second in a man's life. Jules Verne and H.G. Wells projected into future time and Proust brought past time to the present. Radical changes were taking place in all of the arts.
We then looked at the Post WWII American artists who, once freed from the dominance of European Art, made Expressionist art more and more abstract. The main guru of this period was Clement Greenberg who believed that art should have aesthetic principles to which all artists adhered. Principle among these principles were the flat canvas (no depth nor perspective) and a focus on the "painterly" aspects of a painting: line, color, shape, texture, rather than on objects, scenery, or stories. Once all objects were removed the art became more and more abstract. The main artists of this period were Pollock, Motherwell, Clyfford Stills, Barnett Newman and the color field painters: Morris Louis, Helen Frankenthaler, Joan Mitchell and Yves Klein. Mark Rothko represented color field painting at its height. After this period painting became more and more abstract, as in the works of Ellsworth Kelly, Frank Stella and Ad Reinhardt until they so distanced themselves from the viewer, in the period of Minimalism, that a reaction set in.
The reaction was introduced by the works of Rauschenberg and Jasper Johns, both of whom were said to have bridged the periods of Minimalism and Pop Art. These artists wanted to bring the world of common objects into their pictures and so began the tradition of "combines" and collages, and conceptual art. The Pop Artists who followed them were Warhol, Lichtenstein, Claus Oldenberg, Baldessari and Jeff Coons, among others. Much of their work were critical and/or satirical representations of the popular culture of the day.
Artists in this period, such as David Park, Elmer Bischoff, Diebenkorn and Oliviera, in California, revived the painting of figures in a style known as Naive Figurative Painting. Later proponents of this style were Manuel Neri and Joan Brown.
Next week we'll look at some artists whose work could not be easily categorized, and then go on to the 60's revolution in the arts.
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
Early Modern Art
March 3, 2008Before continuing with the artists of the Early Modern period, I addressed a question about "naive" and "folk art" and children's art. While some people paint in the style of "folk art" because it is part of their culture and all that they have been exposed to, others might paint that way because they are not trained in art and paint the world as it appears to them. Still others might make a deliberate choice to use a "folk art" style because it fits the "message" they are trying to deliver. The selection of a style of art depends upon a number of factors: exposure to alternative styles, a genetic component of physical visual acuity and talent, resources available, and the artist's values and intent.
The question of children's art came up and I spoke about the film about the child who became famous for her abstract paintings until there was an expose about "coaching" by the father. In the film the child had been compared to Pollock who was said to have splashed his paint expressively on the canvas. The difference, however, is that Pollock had art training, was exposed to many styles of art and experimented with many, before deliberately choosing his style for his particular purposes. The film represented exploitation of the child every step of the way in her short career.
We then went back to the survey of the styles of art that were popular at the end of the 19th Century and beginning of the 20th Century. Our focus is on the concept of "styles" in art - ways of doing art that have different prominent values and rules for presenting them. It is only by understanding the main intents of each style, and their restrictive rules, will we be able to understand Post-Modern/Contemporary art.
We looked next at the colorists Gaugin, Van Gogh, Seurat, Matisse and the Fauvists, and Kandinsky, all of whom believed that color delivered its own message of emotions and was more important than objects or any representation of reality. Next we looked at the Cubists and their contributions to perceptual awareness with their representations of shapes looked at from many perspectives at one time. And then at the Futurists who represented time now and in the future with paintings and constructions. As art became more and more absurd, two other styles developed: Dada and Surrealism. Dada attempted to return to the innocence of children at play and Surrealists depicted a dream world of incongruities and exaggerations to increase our awareness .
While these artists were concerned with space and time and color and perception, another group was concerned with the ordinary lives of people in actual places. Robert Henri influenced artists for forty years, who showed "real life" including the "seamy side" . His students included Edward Hopper, Ben Shahn and John Sloan. In Mexico, the muralists were painting their messages in public buildings and did so in the U.S. with more or less success. Rivera and Siqueros were not accepted here because of their radical social depictions, but Orozco was able to complete his murals in Dartmouth.
The paintings of the early twentieth century were in keeping with the changes that developed in music and in literature. Next week we'll start by looking at this cultural milieu and then go on to Modern Art after WW II.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
POSTSCRIPT
I was asked to post a summary of what I described as the method of philosophy, that I said can be followed when inquiring into any aspects of our societies.
Here it is:
1) Collect data concerning all of the alternative approaches used in the subject of your inquiry. See WHAT is done and HOW it is done. (e.g. What do Behaviorists, Freudian Psychoanalysts, Jungian Psychoanalysts, Humanistic Psychologists, Cognitive Psychologists..., DO? HOW do they do it?)
2) Ask WHY they do what they do. This should take you to the concept/generalizations/laws/rules/principles (reasons why) of their theories.
3) Ask now what the major assumptions of their different theories are? (What do they assume about man/society/reality...?). And ask what it is they value in choosing the theories that they do. This should reveal the desired goals/ends
of that theory (#2) and that practice (#1).
In our inquiry into Art we look at the different practices and methods of the artists - individually, or in groups (styles). Then we ask Why they practice their art in that form to find what rules/principles they believe . And we then look at what they assume Art "Is" and what is important to them to achieve (values).
While no one will be tested on this method, it may help you to ask questions about the Art you see.